![]() ![]() Therefore, instead of careful argumentation, inference from commonly accepted principles must be used. ![]() In other words, s ome people, because they lack logical training or have a short attention span, cannot be convinced of truth claims or to take good actions by careful argument. For scientific discourse is concerned with instruction, but in the case of such persons instruction is impossible our proofs and arguments must rest on generally accepted principles, as we said in the Topics, when speaking of converse with the multitude. This is especially important if Aristotle was correct when he observed that:įurther, in dealing with certain persons, even if we possessed the most accurate scientific knowledge, we should not find it easy to persuade them by the employment of such knowledge. But knowing logic without knowing what actually persuades or interests others can make a speaker or writer boring and unhelpful. For instance, logic, which is part of dialectic, helps one to be more rhetorically capable in the case of debate. ( Rhetoric 1.2.1)įor a further discussion of rhetoric and dialectic, see Aristotle’s Rhetoric at Stanford Philosophocal Encyclopedia.Ĭlearly, the two are related. It deals with demonstration and probabilities, especially when persuading others to act. Rhetoric is the art of discovering what is persuasive, why it is persuasive, and for what it is persuading.(Aristotle Rhetoric 1.1.1-14) You should note that I am collapsing Aristotle’s concept of analytics into dialectic here (analytics deals with the form of argument and the various demonstrations that can be made once facts are discovered). It essentially a question and answer process. This is a dialogical (conversational) or monological skill. Dialectic is the art of utilizing logic and facts properly for the discovery, explanation, and demonstration of truth and probabilities.Rhetoric and dialectic are distinct forms and even methods of communication, and as such should be distinguished. I’ve taught research, writing, and public speaking for 10 years now, and the distinction between rhetoric and dialectic has become such a tool for me. But all of us know of a tool that becomes quintessential to who we are because of how it increases our capacity to be human. For others, it might be their phone or laptop. ![]() I tend to think of shoes, my pocket knife, and my car that way. Sometimes a tool becomes so important to us, it’s impossible to imagine not having it. Knowing the difference between the two will make you a better reader, listener, thinker, writer, and speaker. Therefore, the cultural-individual dialectic should also be taken into consideration while developing intercultural relationships.Summary: Rhetoric is the art of persuasion, dialectic of verbal reasoning. Still, the person invited to take a position in this U.S.-based company can have particular attributes, according to which this individual can be described as a creative person who is famous for proposing and promoting original and interesting ideas related to management which can be unexpected by both Germans and Americans. For instance, while inviting a German specialist to work in the department of any U.S.-based multinational company, human resource managers can expect that this person will demonstrate certain characteristics associated with the perceptions of Germans and their approaches to managing time, learning, or conducting business. The example of the cultural-individual dialectic can be associated with discussing perceptions of Germans in the American society. Thus, the cultural-individual dialectic is based on the idea of taking both cultural and individual perspectives into account. The focus only on cultural generalizations can lead to some biases and misunderstanding. Not all perceptions, visions, ideas, and beliefs demonstrated by persons can be influenced by their specific culture. ![]() Therefore, while planning intercultural interactions, people should pay attention to not only cultures of their interlocutors or companions but also to their idiosyncratic features. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |